|
Mediation FAQ
What Is Mediation?
Mediation
is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process whereby the
parties are assisted by a trained and skilled third party. The
mediator facilitates confidential communication, reconciliation and
negotiation between the parties to reach a voluntary and mutually
agreeable resolution.
How Is Mediation
Difference From Legal Litigation?
In legal litigation,
the parties retain attorneys whose focus is to prepare a case which
will result in the best decision for their client by a judge. Often,
litigation includes an adversarial approach demeaning the other
party. In litigation you never know what the outcome will be until
the case is ruled upon. There are no guarantees that anyone will
come out as the 'victorious party'. In the long run, everyone pays a
price in litigation.
Mediation is based on the
principle that people are capable to resolve their own disagreements
if given the right support. Generally, it is non-adversarial and the
parties agree that all information will be openly shared in a safe,
neutral environment. It is a voluntary and confidential process.
Either party can withdraw or choose not to participate at any time.
The mediator does not judge who is right or who is wrong, but works
with parties to help them arrive at a solution to satisfy their
interests. No tape recordings are made and no court reporter is
present. The mediator will not reveal anything discussed during the
mediation to anyone other than the participants. The mediator does not
represent either party. Generally, the mediation does not include
lawyers except in a consulting or reviewing capacity. However, in some
cases, mediation includes both parties and lawyers.
When Is Mediation Useful?
Mediation is effective
when both parties want to resolve a disagreement. It is most effective
when:
• The Issue involves
strong emotional feelings
• The parties know
each other
• The parties want
to maintain their relationship
• One party is
uncomfortable confronting the other side
• The parties have
reached an obstacle in their discussions
• One or both
parties want to avoid costly legal litigation
• The issue does not
involve class action or punitive damages

What Kind Of Disagreement Can Be Mediated?
Generally any kind of
disagreement can be mediated. The exceptions are class action suits,
cases involving punitive damages, and lawsuits which require
statutory, judicial or regulatory case law to resolve. Whether it is a
civil dispute involving hundreds of thousands of dollars, a workplace
dispute, a divorce, or a family matter, the parties can resolve it
without resorting to traditional adversarial litigation. Even after
litigation has been started, mediation can be a practical way to
settle the matter in a less expensive and timely manner
Who Should Consider Mediation?
Mediation works best
for parties who wish to settle without going to court and are willing
to commit to a good faith effort to do so. Mediation is very effective
when the parties live nearby or have to maintain their relationship on
a day-to-day basis. Co-parents, business colleagues or circle of
friends and relatives often have continuing relationships with each
other. There is a mutually beneficial incentive to continue an amiable
relationship and to explore ways to prevent disagreements from arising
in the future. Mediation allows the parties to maintain control over
their decision making rather than letting a judge decide. The parties
control the amount of information that becomes a part of the public
record. Normally, court files are open to the public, including any
allegations made by either party.
What does Mediation do?
Mediation usually
focuses on the underlying interests of the parties, and not their
positions. Mediation is used to
• Define complaints,
problems and disputes
• Discover options
and solutions
• Manage resolution
process in a ‘win-win’ manner
• Facilitate
mutually agreeable settlements
• Formulate
guidelines and policy
• Record agreement
with written documentation
• Helps prevent
future disagreements
What Are The Most Important Aspects Of Mediation?
Aside from low cost
and high success rate, mediation provides four important aspects.
Privacy. The process of mediation is confidential as
it relates to all participants, including attorneys and the mediator.
Everything discussed in the mediation is confidential. Any documents
that are exchanged in the mediation are confidential. Any legal or
other suppositions advanced in the mediation are confidential.
Mediation is not a matter of public record.
Control. No judge will decide the parties’ outcome.
There is no legal precedent or jury to scrutinize right and wrong. The
parties have the unique opportunity to "tell your side of the
story", without lawyers objecting that what you're saying is
inadmissible for some reason. The parties have the experience of
creating your own resolution in your own words to resolve their
disagreement.
Relationships. Most relationships are important to maintain
intact. Business partnerships, family, friendships and social
relationships of long standing are often soothed and become closer as
a result of mediation.
Responsibility. The mediation process encourages the parties
to assume personal responsibility for their respective roles in the
disagreement. It’s not blaming the other side but rather accepting
ownership for the things contributed or done to create the
disagreement. Remember, its takes two to tangle.
Speed. Resolution for most disagreements is usually
achievable within a day or two and no longer than 30 days. More
complex disputes and conflicts may require more time and communication
to explore the interests and positions involved.

What Are The Direct Benefits Of Mediation?
Mediation usually
provides a quicker, more cost effective and more satisfactory outcome
than legal litigation. It may take months and sometimes years to
resolve a disagreement in court, mediation can be paced according to
the parties’ needs and schedule. Mediation is voluntary and requires
both parties agreement to the make a final resolution. Therefore,
parties are more satisfied with the outcome than with a decision made
by a judge or jury. This results in a higher likelihood of compliance
with the mutual agreement since parties are usually more likely to
comply with a solution to which they agreed. In mediation, the parties
are able to customize the resolution agreement to meet their needs
rather than being constrained by the limited options available in
court. Most important, parties are more likely to preserve an amicable
relationship in the future.
Who Wins, Who Loses In Mediation?
In theory, no one
loses; everyone wins. This does not mean that both sides come away
from mediation automatically happy with the outcome. Each party must
be comfortable enough to tell their story and assert their interests.
The mediator facilitates and makes sure each party is heard, however
it is each person’s responsibility to say what is on their mind.
Mediation is without time constraints and can be conduct over several
days or weeks. This provides each party time to think, reconfirm their
interests and to explore solutions. Whatever is agreed upon is mutual
and neither party is forced to agree anything which they do not want.
However, common sense teaches use that closure is important and
sometimes we must bend a little to get what we really need.
When Is The Best Time To Begin Mediation?
The best time is
sooner rather than later, before the parties incur the expense and
emotional turmoil of legal litigation. It frequently happens that one
party is ready to begin mediating before the other, so some
sensitivity to the feelings of the other party is courteous. If legal
representation has already been secured, it is not too late. Most
cases settle before trial, so it's almost never too late to mediate.
Most legal professionals and courts advise mediation before
litigation.
Who Can Request Mediation?
Anyone can. Mediation
is available to everyone with a disagreements seeking closure.
What Goes On At A Mediation Session?
Within a mediation
session, two types of meetings can occur. First, the joint session.
This is when everyone is present; parties, their representatives and
lawyers meet with the mediator and outline the basic issues, interests
and positions of each side. The second type of meeting is called
caucus. A caucus is a private and confidential meeting between the
mediator and one of parties and their attorney(s). In mediations, both
types of meetings occur as it helps overcome positional obstacles and
helps maintains a forward progress toward a mutually agreeable
resolution.
How Do The Parties And The Mediator Work Together?
The normal process is
for the parties and mediator to meet together, at scheduled sessions
determined by the parties. Essentially mediation runs like a guided
negotiation between the parties, with the mediator facilitating the
communication. Most meditations generally run by the following
five-stage format:
Stage 1: Establishing
the Process: The mediator and the parties agree to a number of
guidelines they will follow in the mediation. This usually includes
only allowing one person to speak at a time, treating all parties with
respect, and confidentially.
Stage 2: Exploring
Positions and Interests: The parties usually make their initial
statements regarding their disagreement and define what they hope to
resolve in the mediation.
Stage 3: Developing
Solutions: Each party discusses their interests and possible solutions
to resolve their disagreement.
Stage 4: Finalizing A
Resolution: The parties assisted by the mediator create a solution
mutually agreeable to both parties.
Stage 5: The Written
Agreement: Once agreed on, the solution is formalized in a written
resolution agreement.

What Does The Mediator(s) Do, During The
Mediation,?
Traditionally
mediation is conduct by a single mediator. However, co-mediation or a
panel of three mediators is becoming commonplace. Co-mediation and
panel mediation allows each party to select a mediator instead of
mutually agreeing on a single one.
At the Initial
Session:
- Assess whether and
how to intervene with the Parties
- Creates a
comfortable environment for communication
- Invites parties to
participate, to share their thoughts and concerns
- Establishes the
purpose, structure and guidelines of mediation with the parties.
Throughout the
Session:
- Helps each party to
feel heard, respected and acknowledged
- Identifies the key
issues that parties need to address and the interests influencing
these issues
- Outlines the issues
and interests so they can be visually seen
- Continues to create
an ambiance of safety and dignity
- Helps keep the
process focused and forward moving
- Manages emotions and
communication styles
- Deals with
unproductive power dynamics and egos
- Encourages risk
taking
- Facilitates an
effective negotiation process
- Sorts out personal
and emotional impasses and position obstacles.
During the Resolution
Process:
- Encourages
creativity and out-of-the-box ideas
- Helps parties
brainstorm solutions with each other
- Helps each party
think through their options
- Establishes
vocabulary words of potential agreements
- Discuss how agreed
resolutions can be implemented
- Drafts a Resolution
Agreement to be reviewed
- Finalizes Resolution
Agreement in writing signed both parties

How Long Does Mediation Take?
The length of
mediation is determined by a variety of factors including the
complexity of the issues, the complexity of the relationships, the
number of participants, the cooperation of the parties, and the
readiness of the parties to explore a mutually satisfying resolution.
While some mediations are completed within a half-day session, it can
take several half and full-day sessions to reach a mutually agreeable
resolution. The each parties control the length of the mediation.
Why Use Mediation If We Are Unable To Agree?
Most times it is not
so much ‘not wanting’ to agree but is ‘knowing how’ to agree.
A mediator can bring a new perspective. The mediator’s own
experiences and knowledge can assist parties in exploring alternatives
that they might not have previously considered.
Do I Need To Hire A Lawyer To Mediate?
Parties may or may not
want lawyers to be present. It is a choice that is usually discussed
between the parties prior to mediation. Some parties prefer to decline
legal consultation and instead do their own research. Others,
especially in complex issues, feel more secure with a legal
representative present. Most parties in mediation prefer to have a
consulting lawyer present to answer questions that may come up during
the mediation. In addition, the lawyer can clarify information
provided by the mediator or provide another perspective. The
consulting lawyer can also review the resolution agreement to be sure
it accurately describes the agreement reached, is clear and
enforceable.
If I Don’t Bring A Lawyer Can I Bring Someone
To Help Assist Me?
Yes, if there is no
objection from the other party. As with lawyer, your assistant is
present to help you fully understand what takes place and what is
discussed in the mediation session. Your representative (lawyer or
non-lawyer) does not speak for you. Mediation is not court. Each party
must present their own ‘case’ and clearly define their position
and interests.
Is Mediation Legally Binding?
The mediation process
is voluntary, however in many Judicial Systems the mutually agreed and
signed resolution agreement is binding and legally enforceable by
virtue of specific language included in the executed agreement reached
between the parties. This should be discussed with a lawyer prior to
mediation.
If I Use Mediation, Will I Need To Go To
Court?
In specific cases, for
example, in divorce you need to file in court the divorce paperwork.
If a mutually agreeable resolution in mediation to all of the
property, financial, custody, parenting and other issues and the court
accepts your settlement, it is unlikely that you will have to make
many, or any, court appearances. Please consult with a lawyer prior to
mediation on your local Judicial System requirements.
Must An Agreement Be Reached In Mediation?

No, party is not
forced to accept a solution that does not meet his/her interests and
needs. The parties should understand that the mediation goal is to
create a solution that comes as close as possible to a
"win-win" agreement, while recognizing that parties don't
receive everything on their wish list. If no resolution, the parties
may still go to court to resolve their disagreement.
Can A Mediator Be A Witness Or Talk To The Judge?
No. Mediator can
neither be a witness nor talk to anyone about the case. Additionally,
neither the parties nor their attorneys may introduce into evidence
what happened or did not happen during the mediation.
What Should I Know About A Mediator Before
Choosing One?
You should approach
hiring a mediator just like you would any other professional. Speak
with many mediators to get a feel for their style and approach to the
process. In addition, ask questions about the following:
- Training, experience
and background;
- Experience or
knowledge in mediating the type of issues you have;
- Fees charged and how
fees are divided among the parties to the mediation;
What Are The Advantages Of Mediation Over Litigation?
- Timely resolutions
- Reduced legal costs
- Privacy and
confidentiality of issues and parties
- Preservation of
relationships
- Reduction of court
back-logs
- Less intimidating
process than litigation
- No cross examination
- Control over the
proceedings
- Opportunities for
disputants to express their interests
- Limited compromising
of legal rights

Are There Different Types Of Mediation?
Yes. The role of the
mediator is a bit different in each type and most mediators utilize a
combination of these types.
Facilitative
Mediation: In a facilitative
mediation, the mediator will take an active role in controlling the
"process." The mediator asks questions to identify the
interests of the parties and the real issues in the disagreement. The
mediator helps the parties explore solutions that benefit both
parties. In a facilitative mediation, the mediator does not offer an
opinion on the strengths and weaknesses of the parties' cases. The
mediator does not suggest solutions.
Transformative
Mediation: Transformative
mediators try to change the nature of interaction by a) helping each
party appreciate each others viewpoints; and b) by strengthening each
party’s ability to handle disagreement in a productive positive
manner. The mediator will intervene in the conversation between the
parties in order to call attention to moments of recognition and
empowerment. Ground rules for the mediation are set only if the
parties set them. The mediator does not direct the parties to topics
or issues. Instead, the mediator follows the parties’ conversation
and assist them to talk about what they think is important. The
transformative mediator does not offer an opinion on the strengths or
weaknesses of the parties’ cases. The mediator does not suggest
solutions.
Evaluative Mediation: Evaluative mediators use their expertise to
focus and assist parties: a) to assess the strengths and weaknesses of
their legal or other positions; and b) to achieve settlements. In
evaluative mediation, the mediator controls the process and suggests
solutions for resolving the conflict. Individual meetings between the
mediator and one party at a time (caucuses) are a major component of
evaluative mediation. The focus of an evaluative mediation is
primarily upon reaching a settlement. The mediators will make their
best efforts to get the parties to compromise, if necessary, to
achieve a result.
Conciliation: This process is similar to mediation but the
conciliator acts more as an 'inventor' of solutions which are
presented to the parties with a view of getting them to agree as to
how the disagreement can be resolved. The conciliation mediator
frequently provides suggestions and out-of-the-box ideas. Conciliation
differs from mediation in that the main goal is to conciliate, most of
the time by seeking concessions. Generally there is a mixture of
fact-to-face and private caucuses sometimes referred to as ‘shuttle
diplomacy’. The conciliator meets with each party to separately
prioritize a list of interests from most to least important. Then goes
back and forth between the parties and encourages them to
"give" on the issues one at a time, starting with the least
important and working toward the most important for each party in
turn. The parties rarely place the same priorities on all objectives,
and usually have some objectives that are not on the list. The
conciliator builds a string of agreements and help the parties create
an atmosphere of trust which the conciliator can continue to develop
into a ‘total’ mutually agreeable resolution.
Evaluative Mediation: Evaluative mediators use their expertise to
focus and assist parties: a) to assess the strengths and weaknesses of
their legal or other positions; and b) to achieve settlements. In
evaluative mediation, the mediator controls the process and suggests
solutions for resolving the conflict. Individual meetings between the
mediator and one party at a time (caucuses) are a major component of
evaluative mediation. The focus of an evaluative mediation is
primarily upon reaching a settlement. The mediators will make their
best efforts to get the parties to compromise, if necessary, to
achieve a result.
Conciliation: This process is similar to mediation but the
conciliator acts more as an 'inventor' of solutions which are
presented to the parties with a view of getting them to agree as to
how the disagreement can be resolved. The conciliation mediator
frequently provides suggestions and out-of-the-box ideas. Conciliation
differs from mediation in that the main goal is to conciliate, most of
the time by seeking concessions. Generally there is a mixture of
fact-to-face and private caucuses sometimes referred to as ‘shuttle
diplomacy’. The conciliator meets with each party to separately
prioritize a list of interests from most to least important. Then goes
back and forth between the parties and encourages them to
"give" on the issues one at a time, starting with the least
important and working toward the most important for each party in
turn. The parties rarely place the same priorities on all objectives,
and usually have some objectives that are not on the list. The
conciliator builds a string of agreements and help the parties create
an atmosphere of trust which the conciliator can continue to develop
into a ‘total’ mutually agreeable resolution.
Expert Determination: Historically, this form of mediation has been
used when the parties have strong defined positions that need to be
subjected to an ‘expert’ or panel of experts to evaluate their
positions, define the specific interests and help craft a suitable
solution. The expert mediator(s) are very knowledgeable and possesses
years of expertise in the area of the disagreement, dispute or
conflict. Both parties of the mediation respect and trust the
mediator(s) to help them resolve their differences and craft a
solution that will be mutually beneficial to them and to their
particular field or industry. Often the mediation details are not
confidential, except for trade secrets, as industry policies and
guidelines are often determined. The mediator(s) is empowered to make
a settlement and/or policy which may or may not be agreeable to either
party.
How do I Get Started?
There are several
international, national and local mediation organizations and
associations. Some are non-profit and others are for-profit. In
business matters, the first starting step is to have an Alternative
Dispute Resolution clause in your written agreements and contracts
that establish the procedures and structure for handling disputes. In
personal and community matters, most agreements are simple and verbal.
If there is no written or discussed agreement between parties on how
to handle disagreements, please contact an ADR Professional.
Have
questions or Comments ?
Please direct them to in our attention via email info@mediationJd.com.
We will respond in timely fashion via email or website FAQ. Thank you.

|